| |
March/April 2003
Insights
How can we transform high school so that students engage inand not just prepare
forthe "real" world?
By Laura Cooper, David Allen, and Steve Newman
There seems to be this perception that in order to get the most out of high
school, you have to take the most AP classes, when there is actually so much
more that can be learned. . . . As shut off as it seems, high school is actually
the real world, if you allow it to be."
This reflection by a student at Evanston Township (Ill.) High School (ETHS)
recalls John Dewey's admonition that "education is not a preparation for
life; education is life itself." Too often, high school, especially senior
year, seems irrelevant to students and disconnected from the "real world." Students at ETHS have made the compelling point that by treating high school
as simply a time of preparation for life, the importance of senior year is diminished,
especially when they have already accomplished their goal of getting early admission
to college, finding a job, or enlisting in the military.
At ETHSa racially, culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse high
school with 3,200 students located just outside Chicagowe have tried to find
ways to remove the artificial boundary between high school and the real world.
To this end, we have developed workplace internships, included a senior project
in all second-semester courses, offered an array of challenging multilevel electives
in English and history, and passed a graduation requirement for the class of
2006 that requires students to select a "focus"a three-course sequence
in science, world languages, fine arts, or career pathways. One of our most
successful efforts has been the invention of the Senior Studies program. Senior
Studies has prompted us to reexamine not just the senior year, but the entire
high school experience.
Senior Studies centers around a daily, team-taught class (2 hours, 15 minutes)
that awards credit in English, history, and community service. The 60 students
reflect the school's student body in terms of racial diversity and level of
academic performance. The first semester is organized around thematic unitseducation,
violence and crime, writing, community history, community activism, and the
arts. During the second semester students undertake independent projects, pursuing
one or more of four paths: career exploration, traditional academic research,
artistic expression, or community service.
But Senior Studies is more than just an antidote for "senioritis";
it has helped us identify ways to reconceptualize all four years of high school.
While ETHS, or any other high school, must devise its own ways of making high
school "real" for its students, we propose six guiding principles.
Lesson #1: The classroom must become a community of learners.
We build strong and meaningful relationships among students, and between teachers
and students. Senior Studies begins with an orientation unit in which we foster
positive group dynamics and identify and challenge individual comfort zones.
Students go outdoors for group games and problem-solving initiatives, and they
learn about one another's personalities. They create personal profiles, collect
personal artifacts, take a "name quiz," and react in writing to their
first impressions of the course. Orientation culminates with a scavenger hunt
around the city of Evanston, which requires students to work together in a diverse
group, share differing perspectives, and learn essential information about our
community.
Once they become a part of a supportive community, "Senior Studiers,"
as we call them, gain the confidence to take risks. As they formulate opinions
and voice them in a variety of group settings, they are empowered to act. As
one student said, "I have grown from a little girl sitting in the back
of the room to an organizer of a successful fundraiser."
Lesson #2: Students need to go out into the "real world."
Experiential learningfrom field trips and service-learning opportunities
to career exploration internshipsis integral to the program. For example, during
a unit on violence and crime, students share personal experiences to deepen
their understanding of the impact violence has on their classmates; they research
current alternatives to traditional incarceration; they talk with police officers,
public defenders, and reform advocates; and they tour and meet with inmates
of Cook County's Correctional Facility. Senior Studiers consider a wide range
of careers and ways of living, many for the first time. One student said, "I
think the most important thing I learned was that you can do whatever you want.
I don't just mean in terms of projects, but in life. I can't put my finger on
exactly what gave me the impression, but I think it was the real, wide-world
experiences."
Lesson #3: Students' work should be relevant to their lives.
Students must see or be shown that what they are learning is important and
that the products they are creating are useful. For example, students spend
three weeks examining the critical issues of education. We visit other schools,
public and private, big and small, traditional and alternative; we observe classes,
shadow students, and interview teachers; we watch videos about other countries,
such as Germany and Japan, that have different educational systems; and we read
and discuss books by Dewey, Delpit, Kozol, and other classical and cutting-edge
theorists. This investigation concludes when students, in groups of three, design
their ideal charter school. They "sell" their school and its philosophy
at an education fair where other students, staff, and community guests serve
as prospective "parents."
This task requires students to be decisionmakers as well as informed activists.
As one student said, "During the education unit, we ended up discussing
alternative views of education. Our charter school design project was the first
time that I was forced to convert idealistic, abstract opinions into realistic
proposals." To increase student engagement, we build in choice where appropriate;
for instance, students might have a choice of education theorists to study or
a choice of media for presenting a project. We also organize units around essential
questions and assign tasks that require authentic performances.
Lesson #4: The tasks must be intellectually rigorous and relevant.
These instructional approaches help to make the learning personally relevant,
but as teachers we also have some traditional, non-negotiable requirements.
For instance, when designing a charter school, students must have a typed rationale
that explains their philosophy and reasons for their design, a school brochure,
an annotated bibliography on a few educational sources, a detailed sample unit,
and a thorough lesson plan. By making explicit our expectations for quality
work during the first semester, we help students internalize standards of quality
that apply when they work more independently during the second semester. One
student said, "First semester prepared me for the independence that I would
experience. All of the small assignments [such as] personal essays and reflective
letters, the outside experiences [like] community projects, and the choices
that we were given made it easier for me to work independently second semester."
Lesson #5: Individual accountability is enhanced by authentic assessments.
In the second-semester project, students are required to make presentations
to real audiences of parents, students, and community leaders.
Some projects have included:
raising money and collecting school supplies for a destitute
school in Liberia
reading the works of David Mamet and Ayn Rand and incorporating
the themes into a two-person play
researching, designing, and hand-sewing an Elizabethan costume
studying the cultural ramifications of Dominican immigration
in New York City
conducting a 100-person symposium for local leaders to address
violence in our community
Some students choose to work in professional internships at, for instance,
advertising agencies, architectural firms, or the Chicago Board of Trade. In
all cases, students design their own projects and develop detailed proposals
about what they expect to accomplish.
Students meet weekly with an instructor and a faculty mentor, and they maintain
a daily journal that logs research and development. At the end of the experience,
students present their work in two forms. First, they defend their work, present
their products, and discuss their development at an oral defense before a small
committee of eight or nine classmates, teachers, and community leaders. They
also organize their own presentation for an audience of family, friends, and
members of the community. In both arenas students learn from their successes
and failures, and the final grade is often less important than the personal
learning. One student put it this way: "I have never put so much time and
energy into one project in my life. I was more passionate about my work for
this class and for my presentation than I have ever been about anything."
Lesson #6: Students need feedback from a broad audience, not just teachers.
We regularly ask students to reflect on their learning by incorporating feedback
from others and by making personally meaningful connections to their experiences.
In addition to teacher feedback organized around rubrics, students are expected
to elicit and make sense of feedback from other adults. For instance, before
turning in their first-semester portfolios, they must submit a letter written
by an adult (often a parent, tutor, or community leader) who has reviewed it.
During the second semester they must submit a letter written by a sponsor (often
from their community-service site) about their internship. They also learn to
give feedback by participating in small "pods" that meet to review
one another's proposals and presentations. Drawing on feedback and their own
reflections, students write self-assessments to accompany their portfolios and
their final independent projects. By connecting the academic and the personal,
we help students make sense of what they are learning and increase the likelihood
that they will take it with them for life.
Rethinking High School
When asked to redesign the senior year of high school as part of the education
unit, one student vehemently objected: "We can't just redesign the senior
year; we need to change all four years of high school." He was exactly
right. Senior Studies has provided some important lessons and shaped necessary
questions about the high school experience, not just for seniors but for students
of all grades. The mantra to "learn this because it will prepare you for
a good job or help you get into college" no longer satisfies when students
question the assumption that high school should be a relentless exercise in
resumé-building and in collecting academic credits, athletic championships,
and extracurricular kudos.
Reflecting on a college-admissions interview, a Senior Studies student commented, "We spent a few minutes talking about how jarring the visit to the jails
was for me. The visit and my research gave me the capabilities to debate with
my interviewer the effectiveness of the legal system with a confidence that
could never have been possible otherwise." By transcending the artificial
boundary between high school and the real world, this student found an antidote
to senioritis, turning the senior year into a memorable time of academic, social,
and personal achievement.
Laura Cooper is assistant superintendent for curriculum and instruction, David
Allen is a history and Senior Studies teacher, and Steve Newman is an English
and Senior Studies teacher, all at Evanston (Ill.) Township High School.
This article was excerpted from Adolescents at School: Perspectives on Youth, Identity, and Education, edited by Michael Sadowski (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2003). To order: 1-800-513-0763 or http://gseweb.harvard.edu/hepg.
For Further Information
M.W. Kirst. "Overcoming the High School Senior Slump: New Education Policies." Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership and the National Center
for Public Policy and Higher Education, 2001.
National Commission on the High School Senior Year (final report). "Raising
Our Sights: No High School Senior Left Behind." Washington, DC: National
Commission on the High School Senior Year, October 2001. Available online at www.commissiononthesenioryear.org/Report/report.html
National Commission on the High School Senior Year, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Room
4W307, Washington, DC 20202; 202-260-7405; fax: 202-205-6688, www.commissiononthesenioryear.
org/
|
|