November/December 2006
(In)formative Assessments
New tests and activities can help teachers
guide student learning
by Robert Rothman
Although many teachers in the No Child Left
Behind (NCLB) era complain that students take too many tests,
teachers at the John D. Philbrick Elementary School in Boston
eagerly signed on last year to give students six more tests a
year. The tests, known as Formative Assessments of Student Thinking
in Reading, or FAST-R, are short multiple-choice quizzes that
probe key reading skills. The tests are designed so that teachers
can make adjustments to their instruction based on students’
answers.
With FAST-R “we get concrete, helpful
information on students very quickly,” says Steve Zrike,
Philbrick’s principal.
Now used in 46 schools in Boston, FAST-R
is part of a rapidly growing nationwide effort to implement so
called formative assessments—tests that can inform instruction
through timely feedback.
The rest of this article can be found in the current
issue of the Harvard Education Letter. Buy
this issue.
Interview with Ronald
Ferguson
Recent Research on the Achievement Gap
How lifestyle factors and classroom culture
affect black-white differences
For more than a decade, economist Ronald Ferguson
has studied achievement gaps. In 2002, he created the Tripod Project
for School Improvement, a professional development
initiative that uses student and teacher surveys to measure classroom
conditions and student engagement by race and gender. He spoke
with the Harvard Education Letter about the most recent findings
from the Tripod Project surveys.
How do you define “achievement
gap”?
There are a lot of different achievement gaps.
The achievement gap that I focus the most on is the gap between
students of different racial groups whose parents have roughly
the same amount of education. It concerns me that black kids whose
parents have college degrees on average have much lower test scores
than white kids whose parents have college degrees, for example.
You can take just about any level of parental education and we
have these big gaps.
How much progress has been made in
closing black-white achievement gaps?
Huge progress since 1970, not much progress
since 1990. Sixty-two percent of the overall black-white reading-score
gap for 17-year-olds disappeared between 1971 and 1988. About
one-third of the math-score gap disappeared during the same period.
Over the last several years the gap has narrowed significantly
for both 9- and 13-year-olds, but there’s been a bit of
backsliding for the older teens.
There’s been enough progress to
establish firmly that these gaps are not written in stone.
The rest of this article is available in full-text.
To purchase the current issue of the Harvard Education Letter.
Buy this issue.
Three Thousand Missing Hours
Where does the instructional time go?
by Richard F. Elmore
One of the most remarkable things about American
classrooms is how little real teaching goes on there. Over the
past five years or so, I have spent at least three or four days
a month in schools studying the relationship between classroom
practice and school organization. I observe classrooms at all
levels—primary, middle, and secondary grades—and in
all subjects. One of the most striking patterns to emerge is that
teachers spend a great deal of classroom time getting ready to
teach, reviewing and reaching things that have already been taught,
giving instructions to students, overseeing student seatwork,
orchestrating administrative tasks, listening to announcements
on the intercom, or presiding over dead air—and relatively
little time actually teaching new content.
The rest of this article can be found in the current
issue of the Harvard Education Letter. Buy
this issue.
To subscribe to Harvard Education Letter,
click here. |